Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ® ³ª»ç»ê µðÀÚÀÎÀÌ º¯¿¬°ñ ÀÀ·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of thread design on the marginal bone stresses around dental implant

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 49±Ç 4È£ p.316 ~ 323
ÀÌ»óÇö, Á¶±¤Çå, À̱Ժ¹,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ»óÇö ( Lee Sang-Hyun ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶±¤Çå ( Jo Kwang-Hun ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
À̱Ժ¹ ( Lee Kyu-Bok ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Ä¡°ú¿ë ÀÓÇöõÆ® ³ª»ç»ê µðÀÚÀÎÀÌ º¯¿¬°ñ ÀÀ·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ¿Ü°æ 4.1 mm (°æºÎÁ÷°æ 3.5 mm), ¸Å½ÄºÎ ±æÀÌ 10 mÀΠǥÁØÇü ITI ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ(ITI Dental Implant System; Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland)À» ±âº»¸ðµ¨(´ëÁ¶¸ðµ¨)·Î äÅÃÇÏ°í, ±× ¸öüÀÇ ³ª»ç»êÀº ´Ù¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ äÅõǰí ÀÖ´Â »ï°¢Çü, »ç°¢Çü, buttresÇü µðÀÚÀÎÀ» °¡Áö´Â °¡»óÀÇ Çؼ®¸ðµ¨À» 4Á¾ ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù. Çؼ®¸ðµ¨Àº ³ª»ç»ê ÇüÅÂ¿Í Å©±â¿¡ µû¶ó (1) ¸ðµ¨ A (ÀÛÀº »ï°¢Çü ³ª»ç»ê), (2) ¸ðµ¨ B (Å« »ï°¢Çü ³ª»ç»ê), (3) ¸ðµ¨ C (buttresÇü ³ª»ç»ê), ¹× (4) ¸ðµ¨ D (»ç°¢Çü ³ª»ç»ê)·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ¸ðµ¨¸µ°ú Çؼ®¿¡´Â NISA II/DISPLAY III (Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation, Troy, MI, USA) ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. Mesh ±¸¼º¿¡´Â NKTP type 34Çü solid ¿ä¼Ò(4°¢Çü Ãà´ëĪ ¿ä¼Ò, ¿ä¼Ò´ç ÀýÁ¡¼ö 8°³)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀåÃà°ú ÆòÇàÇÑ Ãà´ëĪ ÇÏÁßÀº ¹°·Ð ÀåÃà°ú °æ»ç°¢À» °®´Â ºñÃà´ëĪ ÇÏÁßÁ¶°ÇÀ» ¸ðµÎ Çؼ®ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Ç¥¸éÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ °¢°¢ 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 mm ¶³¾îÁø À§Ä¡¿¡ 5°³ÀÇ ÀÀ·Â°üÂûÁ¡(stress monitoring point)À» ¼³Á¤ ÇÏ¿© ±â·ÏµÈ ÀÀ·Â °ªÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ È¸±ÍºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© º¯¿¬°ñ ÀÀ·Â ÃÖ´ë°ª(peak stress)À» Á¤·®È­ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Çؼ®¿¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ ÇÏÁß Á¶°ÇÀº 2°¡Áö·Î, ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ãà¿¡ ÆòÇàÇÑ ¼öÁ÷ÇÏÁß 100 N°ú ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ãà°ú 30(R)(R)¸¦ ÀÌ·ç´Â °æ»ç·Â 100 N Á¶°ÇÀ̾ú´Ù.

°á°ú: ÀÓÇöõÆ® °æºÎ¿Í Á¢ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀÎÁ¢ º¯¿¬°ñ¿¡ ÀÀ·ÂÁýÁßÇö»óÀÌ º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±× ¾ç»óÀº ÀÓÇöõÆ® ³ª»ç»ê µðÀÚÀΰú ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô °ÅÀÇ À¯»çÇÏ°Ô °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼öÁ÷·Â 100 N Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ »êÃâµÈ º¯¿¬°ñ ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·Â°ªÀº ´ëÁ¶¸ðµ¨°ú ½ÇÇè¸ðµ¨ A, B, C, D¿¡¼­ 7.84, 6.45, 5.96, 6.85, 5.39 MPaÀ̾ú°í, °æ»ç·Â Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­´Â °¢°¢ 29.18, 26.45, 25.12, 27.37, 23.58 MPaÀ̾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÀÓÇöõÆ® ³ª»ç»êÀÇ µðÀÚÀÎÀº º¯¿¬°ñÀÇ ÀÀ·Â¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ä¼ÒÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different thread designs on the marginal bone stresses around dental implant.

Materials and Methods : Standard ITI implant(ITI Dental Implant System; Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland), 4.1 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length, was selected as control. Test implants of four different thread patterns were created based on control implant, i.e. maintaining all geometrical design of control implant except thread pattern. Four thread designs used in test implants include (1) small V-shape screw (model A), (2) large V-shape screw (model B), (3) buttress screw (model C), and (4) trapezoid screw (model D). Surface area for unit length of implant was 14.4 mm2 (control), 21.7 (small V-shape screw), 20.6 (large V-shape screw), 17.0 (buttress screw) and 28.7 mm2 (trapezoid screw). Finite element models of implant/bone complex were created using an axisymmetric scheme with the use of NISA II/DISPLAY III (Engineering Mechanics Research Corporation, Troy, MI, USA). A load of 100 N applied to the central node on the crown top either in parallel direction or at 30 degree to the implant axis (in order to apply non-axial load to the implant NKTP type 34 element was employed). Quantification and comparison of the peak stress in the marginal bone of each implant model was made using a series of regression analyses based on the stress data calculated at the 5 reference points which were set at 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 mm from implant wall on the marginal bone surface.

Results: Results showed that although severe stress concentration on the marginal bone cannot be avoided a substantial reduction in the peak stress is achievable using different thread design. The peak marginal bone stresses under vertical loading condition were 7.84, 6.45, 5.96, 6.85, 5.39 MPa for control and model A, B, C and D, respectively. And 29.18, 26.45, 25.12, 27.37, 23.58 MPa when subject to inclined loading.

Conclusion: It was concluded that the thread design is an important influential factor to the marginal bone stresses.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ®; ³ª»ç»ê; µðÀÚÀÎ; ÀÀ·Â; º¯¿¬°ñ; À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇؼ®
Implant; Thread; Design; Stress; Marginal bone; Finite element analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed